Tight Kernel Query Complexity of Kernel Ridge Regression and Kernel $k$-means Clustering

May 15, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Machine Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Manuel Fernandez, David P. Woodruff, Taisuke Yasuda arXiv ID 1905.06394 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 6 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We present tight lower bounds on the number of kernel evaluations required to approximately solve kernel ridge regression (KRR) and kernel $k$-means clustering (KKMC) on $n$ input points. For KRR, our bound for relative error approximation to the minimizer of the objective function is $Ξ©(nd_{\mathrm{eff}}^Ξ»/\varepsilon)$ where $d_{\mathrm{eff}}^Ξ»$ is the effective statistical dimension, which is tight up to a $\log(d_{\mathrm{eff}}^Ξ»/\varepsilon)$ factor. For KKMC, our bound for finding a $k$-clustering achieving a relative error approximation of the objective function is $Ξ©(nk/\varepsilon)$, which is tight up to a $\log(k/\varepsilon)$ factor. Our KRR result resolves a variant of an open question of El Alaoui and Mahoney, asking whether the effective statistical dimension is a lower bound on the sampling complexity or not. Furthermore, for the important practical case when the input is a mixture of Gaussians, we provide a KKMC algorithm which bypasses the above lower bound.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted