A Graph Theoretic Additive Approximation of Optimal Transport

May 28, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Neural Information Processing Systems

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nathaniel Lahn, Deepika Mulchandani, Sharath Raghvendra arXiv ID 1905.11830 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.DS, stat.ML Citations 30 Venue Neural Information Processing Systems Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Transportation cost is an attractive similarity measure between probability distributions due to its many useful theoretical properties. However, solving optimal transport exactly can be prohibitively expensive. Therefore, there has been significant effort towards the design of scalable approximation algorithms. Previous combinatorial results [Sharathkumar, Agarwal STOC '12, Agarwal, Sharathkumar STOC '14] have focused primarily on the design of near-linear time multiplicative approximation algorithms. There has also been an effort to design approximate solutions with additive errors [Cuturi NIPS '13, Altschuler \etal\ NIPS '17, Dvurechensky \etal\, ICML '18, Quanrud, SOSA '19] within a time bound that is linear in the size of the cost matrix and polynomial in $C/ฮด$; here $C$ is the largest value in the cost matrix and $ฮด$ is the additive error. We present an adaptation of the classical graph algorithm of Gabow and Tarjan and provide a novel analysis of this algorithm that bounds its execution time by $O(\frac{n^2 C}ฮด+ \frac{nC^2}{ฮด^2})$. Our algorithm is extremely simple and executes, for an arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon$, only $\lfloor \frac{2C}{(1-\varepsilon)ฮด}\rfloor + 1$ iterations, where each iteration consists only of a Dijkstra-type search followed by a depth-first search. We also provide empirical results that suggest our algorithm is competitive with respect to a sequential implementation of the Sinkhorn algorithm in execution time. Moreover, our algorithm quickly computes a solution for very small values of $ฮด$ whereas Sinkhorn algorithm slows down due to numerical instability.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted