On the Efficiency of Entropic Regularized Algorithms for Optimal Transport

June 01, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of machine learning research

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tianyi Lin, Nhat Ho, Michael I. Jordan arXiv ID 1906.01437 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.LG, stat.CO, stat.ML Citations 55 Venue Journal of machine learning research Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We present several new complexity results for the entropic regularized algorithms that approximately solve the optimal transport (OT) problem between two discrete probability measures with at most $n$ atoms. First, we improve the complexity bound of a greedy variant of Sinkhorn, known as \textit{Greenkhorn}, from $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-3})$ to $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-2})$. Notably, our result can match the best known complexity bound of Sinkhorn and help clarify why Greenkhorn significantly outperforms Sinkhorn in practice in terms of row/column updates as observed by~\citet{Altschuler-2017-Near}. Second, we propose a new algorithm, which we refer to as \textit{APDAMD} and which generalizes an adaptive primal-dual accelerated gradient descent (APDAGD) algorithm~\citep{Dvurechensky-2018-Computational} with a prespecified mirror mapping $Ο†$. We prove that APDAMD achieves the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^2\sqrtΞ΄\varepsilon^{-1})$ in which $Ξ΄>0$ stands for the regularity of $Ο†$. In addition, we show by a counterexample that the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(\min\{n^{9/4}\varepsilon^{-1}, n^2\varepsilon^{-2}\})$ proved for APDAGD before is invalid and give a refined complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/2}\varepsilon^{-1})$. Further, we develop a \textit{deterministic} accelerated variant of Sinkhorn via appeal to estimated sequence and prove the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/3}\varepsilon^{-4/3})$. As such, we see that accelerated variant of Sinkhorn outperforms Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn in terms of $1/\varepsilon$ and APDAGD and accelerated alternating minimization (AAM)~\citep{Guminov-2021-Combination} in terms of $n$. Finally, we conduct the experiments on synthetic and real data and the numerical results show the efficiency of Greenkhorn, APDAMD and accelerated Sinkhorn in practice.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted