On the Efficiency of Entropic Regularized Algorithms for Optimal Transport
June 01, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of machine learning research
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Tianyi Lin, Nhat Ho, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv ID
1906.01437
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC,
cs.LG,
stat.CO,
stat.ML
Citations
55
Venue
Journal of machine learning research
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We present several new complexity results for the entropic regularized algorithms that approximately solve the optimal transport (OT) problem between two discrete probability measures with at most $n$ atoms. First, we improve the complexity bound of a greedy variant of Sinkhorn, known as \textit{Greenkhorn}, from $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-3})$ to $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-2})$. Notably, our result can match the best known complexity bound of Sinkhorn and help clarify why Greenkhorn significantly outperforms Sinkhorn in practice in terms of row/column updates as observed by~\citet{Altschuler-2017-Near}. Second, we propose a new algorithm, which we refer to as \textit{APDAMD} and which generalizes an adaptive primal-dual accelerated gradient descent (APDAGD) algorithm~\citep{Dvurechensky-2018-Computational} with a prespecified mirror mapping $Ο$. We prove that APDAMD achieves the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^2\sqrtΞ΄\varepsilon^{-1})$ in which $Ξ΄>0$ stands for the regularity of $Ο$. In addition, we show by a counterexample that the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(\min\{n^{9/4}\varepsilon^{-1}, n^2\varepsilon^{-2}\})$ proved for APDAGD before is invalid and give a refined complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/2}\varepsilon^{-1})$. Further, we develop a \textit{deterministic} accelerated variant of Sinkhorn via appeal to estimated sequence and prove the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/3}\varepsilon^{-4/3})$. As such, we see that accelerated variant of Sinkhorn outperforms Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn in terms of $1/\varepsilon$ and APDAGD and accelerated alternating minimization (AAM)~\citep{Guminov-2021-Combination} in terms of $n$. Finally, we conduct the experiments on synthetic and real data and the numerical results show the efficiency of Greenkhorn, APDAMD and accelerated Sinkhorn in practice.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted