Planting Trees for scalable and efficient Canonical Hub Labeling
June 29, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Kartik Lakhotia, Qing Dong, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor Prasanna
arXiv ID
1907.00140
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Citations
14
Venue
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Point-to-Point Shortest Distance (PPSD) query is a crucial primitive in graph database applications. Hub labeling algorithms compute a labeling that converts a PPSD query into a list intersection problem (over a pre-computed indexing) enabling swift query response. However, constructing hub labeling is computationally challenging. Even state-of-the-art parallel algorithms based on Pruned Landmark Labeling (PLL) [3], are plagued by large label size, violation of given network hierarchy, poor scalability and inability to process large graphs. In this paper, we develop novel parallel shared-memory and distributed-memory algorithms for constructing the Canonical Hub Labeling (CHL) that is minimal in size for a given network hierarchy. To the best of our knowledge, none of the existing parallel algorithms guarantee canonical labeling. Our key contribution, the PLaNT algorithm, scales well beyond the limits of current practice by completely avoiding inter-node communication. PLaNT also enables the design of a collaborative label partitioning scheme across multiple nodes for completely in-memory processing of massive graphs whose labels cannot fit on a single machine. Compared to the sequential PLL, we empirically demonstrate upto 47.4x speedup on a 72 thread shared-memory platform. On a 64-node cluster, PLaNT achieves an average 42x speedup over single node execution. Finally, we show how our approach demonstrates superior scalability - we can process 14x larger graphs (in terms of label size) and construct hub labeling orders of magnitude faster compared to state-of-the-art distributed paraPLL algorithm.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted