Sparse Regular Expression Matching

July 10, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Philip Bille, Inge Li GΓΈrtz arXiv ID 1907.04752 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 6 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A regular expression specifies a set of strings formed by single characters combined with concatenation, union, and Kleene star operators. Given a regular expression $R$ and a string $Q$, the regular expression matching problem is to decide if $Q$ matches any of the strings specified by $R$. Regular expressions are a fundamental concept in formal languages and regular expression matching is a basic primitive for searching and processing data. A standard textbook solution [Thompson, CACM 1968] constructs and simulates a nondeterministic finite automaton, leading to an $O(nm)$ time algorithm, where $n$ is the length of $Q$ and $m$ is the length of $R$. Despite considerable research efforts only polylogarithmic improvements of this bound are known. Recently, conditional lower bounds provided evidence for this lack of progress when Backurs and Indyk [FOCS 2016] proved that, assuming the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH), regular expression matching cannot be solved in $O((nm)^{1-Ξ΅})$, for any constant $Ξ΅> 0$. Hence, the complexity of regular expression matching is essentially settled in terms of $n$ and $m$. In this paper, we take a new approach and introduce a \emph{density} parameter, $Ξ”$, that captures the amount of nondeterminism in the NFA simulation on $Q$. The density is at most $nm+1$ but can be significantly smaller. Our main result is a new algorithm that solves regular expression matching in $$O\left(Ξ”\log \log \frac{nm}Ξ” +n + m\right)$$ time. This essentially replaces $nm$ with $Ξ”$ in the complexity of regular expression matching. We complement our upper bound by a matching conditional lower bound that proves that we cannot solve regular expression matching in time $O(Ξ”^{1-Ξ΅})$ for any constant $Ξ΅> 0$ assuming SETH.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted