Modular Verification of Heap Reachability Properties in Separation Logic

August 16, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proc. ACM Program. Lang.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Arshavir Ter-Gabrielyan, Alexander J. Summers, Peter MΓΌller arXiv ID 1908.05799 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Cross-listed cs.LO Citations 9 Venue Proc. ACM Program. Lang. Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The correctness of many algorithms and data structures depends on reachability properties, that is, on the existence of chains of references between objects in the heap. Reasoning about reachability is difficult for two main reasons. First, any heap modification may affect an unbounded number of reference chains, which complicates modular verification, in particular, framing. Second, general graph reachability is not supported by SMT solvers, which impedes automatic verification. In this paper, we present a modular specification and verification technique for reachability properties in separation logic. For each method, we specify reachability only locally within the fragment of the heap on which the method operates. A novel form of reachability framing for relatively convex subheaps allows one to extend reachability properties from the heap fragment of a callee to the larger fragment of its caller, enabling precise procedure-modular reasoning. Our technique supports practically important heap structures, namely acyclic graphs with a bounded outdegree as well as (potentially cyclic) graphs with at most one path (modulo cycles) between each pair of nodes. The integration into separation logic allows us to reason about reachability and other properties in a uniform way, to verify concurrent programs, and to automate our technique via existing separation logic verifiers. We demonstrate that our verification technique is amenable to SMT-based verification by encoding a number of benchmark examples into the Viper verification infrastructure.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted