What is needed for simple spatial language capabilities in VQA?

August 17, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ViGIL@NeurIPS

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alexander Kuhnle, Ann Copestake arXiv ID 1908.06336 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG Citations 1 Venue ViGIL@NeurIPS Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Visual question answering (VQA) comprises a variety of language capabilities. The diagnostic benchmark dataset CLEVR has fueled progress by helping to better assess and distinguish models in basic abilities like counting, comparing and spatial reasoning in vitro. Following this approach, we focus on spatial language capabilities and investigate the question: what are the key ingredients to handle simple visual-spatial relations? We look at the SAN, RelNet, FiLM and MC models and evaluate their learning behavior on diagnostic data which is solely focused on spatial relations. Via comparative analysis and targeted model modification we identify what really is required to substantially improve upon the CNN-LSTM baseline.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Fast R-CNN

Ross Girshick

cs.CV πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 27.7K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted