PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation with Prototype Alignment

August 18, 2019 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

๐ŸŒ… TWILIGHT: Old Age
Predates the code-sharing era โ€” a pioneer of its time

"Last commit was 5.0 years ago (โ‰ฅ5 year threshold)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: .gitignore, README.md, config.py, dataloaders, experiments, models, test.py, train.py, util

Authors Kaixin Wang, Jun Hao Liew, Yingtian Zou, Daquan Zhou, Jiashi Feng arXiv ID 1908.06391 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 1.3K Venue IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Repository https://github.com/kaixin96/PANet โญ 356 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Despite the great progress made by deep CNNs in image semantic segmentation, they typically require a large number of densely-annotated images for training and are difficult to generalize to unseen object categories. Few-shot segmentation has thus been developed to learn to perform segmentation from only a few annotated examples. In this paper, we tackle the challenging few-shot segmentation problem from a metric learning perspective and present PANet, a novel prototype alignment network to better utilize the information of the support set. Our PANet learns class-specific prototype representations from a few support images within an embedding space and then performs segmentation over the query images through matching each pixel to the learned prototypes. With non-parametric metric learning, PANet offers high-quality prototypes that are representative for each semantic class and meanwhile discriminative for different classes. Moreover, PANet introduces a prototype alignment regularization between support and query. With this, PANet fully exploits knowledge from the support and provides better generalization on few-shot segmentation. Significantly, our model achieves the mIoU score of 48.1% and 55.7% on PASCAL-5i for 1-shot and 5-shot settings respectively, surpassing the state-of-the-art method by 1.8% and 8.6%.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computer Vision