Two-Stage Session-based Recommendations with Candidate Rank Embeddings

August 22, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Lecture Notes in Social Networks

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors JosΓ© Antonio SΓ‘nchez RodrΓ­guez, Jui-Chieh Wu, Mustafa Khandwawala arXiv ID 1908.08284 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 1 Venue Lecture Notes in Social Networks Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Recent advances in Session-based recommender systems have gained attention due to their potential of providing real-time personalized recommendations with high recall, especially when compared to traditional methods like matrix factorization and item-based collaborative filtering. Nowadays, two of the most recent methods are Short-Term Attention/Memory Priority Model for Session-based Recommendation (STAMP) and Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation (NARM). However, when these two methods were applied in the similar-item recommendation dataset of Zalando (Fashion-Similar), they did not work out-of-the-box compared to a simple Collaborative-Filtering approach. Aiming for improving the similar-item recommendation, we propose to concentrate efforts on enhancing the rank of the few most relevant items from the original recommendations, by employing the information of the session of the user encoded by an attention network. The efficacy of this strategy was confirmed when using a novel Candidate Rank Embedding that encodes the global ranking information of each candidate in the re-ranking process. Experimental results in Fashion-Similar show significant improvements over the baseline on Recall and MRR at 20, as well as improvements in Click Through Rate based on an online test. Additionally, it is important to point out from the evaluation that was performed the potential of this method on the next click prediction problem because when applied to STAMP and NARM, it improves the Recall and MRR at 20 on two publicly available real-world datasets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted