Analyzing the Context of Bug-Fixing Changes in the OpenStack Cloud Computing Platform

August 29, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Domenico Cotroneo, Luigi De Simone, Antonio Ken Iannillo, Roberto Natella, Stefano Rosiello, Nematollah Bidokhti arXiv ID 1908.11297 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 8 Venue IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many research areas in software engineering, such as mutation testing, automatic repair, fault localization, and fault injection, rely on empirical knowledge about recurring bug-fixing code changes. Previous studies in this field focus on what has been changed due to bug-fixes, such as in terms of code edit actions. However, such studies did not consider where the bug-fix change was made (i.e., the context of the change), but knowing about the context can potentially narrow the search space for many software engineering techniques (e.g., by focusing mutation only on specific parts of the software). Furthermore, most previous work on bug-fixing changes focused on C and Java projects, but there is little empirical evidence about Python software. Therefore, in this paper we perform a thorough empirical analysis of bug-fixing changes in three OpenStack projects, focusing on both the what and the where of the changes. We observed that all the recurring change patterns are not oblivious with respect to the surrounding code, but tend to occur in specific code contexts.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted