Finding Maximum Edge-Disjoint Paths Between Multiple Terminals

September 10, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SIAM journal on computing (Print)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Satoru Iwata, Yu Yokoi arXiv ID 1909.07919 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM Citations 2 Venue SIAM journal on computing (Print) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a multigraph with a set $T\subseteq V$ of terminals. A path in $G$ is called a $T$-path if its ends are distinct vertices in $T$ and no internal vertices belong to $T$. In 1978, Mader showed a characterization of the maximum number of edge-disjoint $T$-paths. In this paper, we provide a combinatorial, deterministic algorithm for finding the maximum number of edge-disjoint $T$-paths. The algorithm adopts an augmenting path approach. More specifically, we utilize a new concept of short augmenting walks in auxiliary labeled graphs to capture a possible augmentation of the number of edge-disjoint $T$-paths. To design a search procedure for a short augmenting walk, we introduce blossoms analogously to the matching algorithm of Edmonds (1965). When the search procedure terminates without finding a short augmenting walk, the algorithm provides a certificate for the optimality of the current edge-disjoint $T$-paths. From this certificate, one can obtain the Edmonds--Gallai type decomposition introduced by SebΕ‘ and SzegΕ‘ (2004). The algorithm runs in $O(|E|^2)$ time, which is much faster than the best known deterministic algorithm based on a reduction to linear matroid parity. We also present a strongly polynomial algorithm for the maximum integer free multiflow problem, which asks for a nonnegative integer combination of $T$-paths maximizing the sum of the coefficients subject to capacity constraints on the edges.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted