Profiling minisat based on user defined execution time -- GPROF
September 28, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Shubhendra Pal Singhal, Sandeep Gupta, Pierluigi Nuzzo
arXiv ID
1909.13058
Category
cs.PL: Programming Languages
Cross-listed
cs.SE
Citations
2
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
This paper focuses on the explanation of the architecture of profilers particularly gprof and how to profile a program according to the user defined input of execution time . Gprof is a profiler available open source in the package of binutils. Gprof records the flow of the program including the callee and caller information and their respective execution time. This information is represented in the form of a call graph. Profilers at the time of execution creates a call graph file which indicates the full flow of the program including the individual execution time as well. This paper aims at providing a better understanding of the data structure used to store the information and how is a profiler(gprof) actually using this data structure to give user a readable format. The next section of this paper solves one of the limitation of gprof i.e. edit the time of block of code without understanding the call graph. Any changes in the execution time of a particular block of code would affect the total execution time. So if we edit the gprof in such a way that its consistent and platform independent, then it can yield various results like testing execution time after parallelism, before even designing it by replacing the values with theoretical/emulated ones and see if the total execution time is getting reduced by a desired number or not? Gprof edit can help us figure out that what section of code can be parallelized or which part of code is taking the most time and which call or part can be changed to reduce the execution time. The last section of the paper walks through the application of gprof in minisat and how gprof helps in the hardware acceleration in minisat by suggesting which part to be parallelised and how does it affect the total percentage.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Programming Languages
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Tensor Comprehensions: Framework-Agnostic High-Performance Machine Learning Abstractions
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Glow: Graph Lowering Compiler Techniques for Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learnable Programming: Blocks and Beyond
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Vandal: A Scalable Security Analysis Framework for Smart Contracts
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted