Comparing Greedy Constructive Heuristic Subtour Elimination Methods for the Traveling Salesman Problem

October 15, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Petar D. Jackovich, Bruce A. Cox, Raymond R. Hill arXiv ID 1910.08625 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.DC, math.OC Citations 2 Venue Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper further defines the class of fragment constructive heuristics used to compute feasible solutions for the Traveling Salesman Problem into arc-greedy and node-greedy subclasses. Since these subclasses of heuristics can create subtours, two known methodologies for subtour elimination on symmetric instances are reviewed and are expanded to cover asymmetric problem instances. This paper introduces a third novel methodology, the Greedy Tracker, and compares it to both known methodologies. Computational results are generated across multiple symmetric and asymmetric instances. The results demonstrate the Greedy Tracker is the fastest method for preventing subtours for instances below 400 nodes. A distinction between fragment constructive heuristics and the subtour elimination methodology used to ensure the feasibility of resulting solutions enables the introduction of a new node-greedy fragment heuristic called Ordered Greedy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted