On Adaptivity in Information-constrained Online Learning

October 19, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Siddharth Mitra, Aditya Gopalan arXiv ID 1910.08805 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed stat.ML Citations 4 Venue AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We study how to adapt to smoothly-varying ('easy') environments in well-known online learning problems where acquiring information is expensive. For the problem of label efficient prediction, which is a budgeted version of prediction with expert advice, we present an online algorithm whose regret depends optimally on the number of labels allowed and $Q^*$ (the quadratic variation of the losses of the best action in hindsight), along with a parameter-free counterpart whose regret depends optimally on $Q$ (the quadratic variation of the losses of all the actions). These quantities can be significantly smaller than $T$ (the total time horizon), yielding an improvement over existing, variation-independent results for the problem. We then extend our analysis to handle label efficient prediction with bandit feedback, i.e., label efficient bandits. Our work builds upon the framework of optimistic online mirror descent, and leverages second order corrections along with a carefully designed hybrid regularizer that encodes the constrained information structure of the problem. We then consider revealing action-partial monitoring games -- a version of label efficient prediction with additive information costs, which in general are known to lie in the \textit{hard} class of games having minimax regret of order $T^{\frac{2}{3}}$. We provide a strategy with an $\mathcal{O}((Q^*T)^{\frac{1}{3}})$ bound for revealing action games, along with one with a $\mathcal{O}((QT)^{\frac{1}{3}})$ bound for the full class of hard partial monitoring games, both being strict improvements over current bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted