Cilkmem: Algorithms for Analyzing the Memory High-Water Mark of Fork-Join Parallel Programs
October 27, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· π SIAM Symposium on Algorithmic Principles of Computer Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Tim Kaler, William Kuszmaul, Tao B. Schardl, Daniele Vettorel
arXiv ID
1910.12340
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
4
Venue
SIAM Symposium on Algorithmic Principles of Computer Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Software engineers designing recursive fork-join programs destined to run on massively parallel computing systems must be cognizant of how their program's memory requirements scale in a many-processor execution. Although tools exist for measuring memory usage during one particular execution of a parallel program, such tools cannot bound the worst-case memory usage over all possible parallel executions. This paper introduces Cilkmem, a tool that analyzes the execution of a deterministic Cilk program to determine its $p$-processor memory high-water mark (MHWM), which is the worst-case memory usage of the program over \emph{all possible} $p$-processor executions. Cilkmem employs two new algorithms for computing the $p$-processor MHWM. The first algorithm calculates the exact $p$-processor MHWM in $O(T_1 \cdot p)$ time, where $T_1$ is the total work of the program. The second algorithm solves, in $O(T_1)$ time, the approximate threshold problem, which asks, for a given memory threshold $M$, whether the $p$-processor MHWM exceeds $M/2$ or whether it is guaranteed to be less than $M$. Both algorithms are memory efficient, requiring $O(p \cdot D)$ and $O(D)$ space, respectively, where $D$ is the maximum call-stack depth of the program's execution on a single thread. Our empirical studies show that Cilkmem generally exhibits low overheads. Across ten application benchmarks from the Cilkbench suite, the exact algorithm incurs a geometric-mean multiplicative overhead of $1.54$ for $p=128$, whereas the approximation-threshold algorithm incurs an overhead of $1.36$ independent of $p$. In addition, we use Cilkmem to reveal and diagnose a previously unknown issue in a large image-alignment program contributing to unexpectedly high memory usage under parallel executions.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted