Analyzing Hack Subnetworks in the Bitcoin Transaction Graph

October 29, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Applied Network Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Daniel Goldsmith, Kim Grauer, Yonah Shmalo arXiv ID 1910.13415 Category physics.soc-ph Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 27 Venue Applied Network Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Hacks are one of the most damaging types of cryptocurrency related crime, accounting for billions of dollars in stolen funds since 2009. Professional investigators at Chainalysis have traced these stolen funds from the initial breach on an exchange to off-ramps, i.e. services where criminals are able to convert the stolen funds into fiat or other cryptocurrencies. We analyzed six hack subnetworks of bitcoin transactions known to belong to two prominent hacking groups. We analyze each hack according to eight network features, both static and temporal, and successfully classify each hack to its respective hacking group through our newly proposed method. We find that the static features, such as node balance, in degree, and out degree are not as useful in classifying the hacks into hacking groups as temporal features related to how quickly the criminals cash out. We validate our operating hypothesis that the key distinction between the two hacking groups is the acceleration with which the funds exit through terminal nodes in the subnetworks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” physics.soc-ph

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Scale-free networks are rare

Anna D. Broido, Aaron Clauset

physics.soc-ph πŸ› Nat. Commun. πŸ“š 988 cites 8 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted