Why Do Masked Neural Language Models Still Need Common Sense Knowledge?

November 08, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sunjae Kwon, Cheongwoong Kang, Jiyeon Han, Jaesik Choi arXiv ID 1911.03024 Category cs.CL: Computation & Language Citations 16 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Currently, contextualized word representations are learned by intricate neural network models, such as masked neural language models (MNLMs). The new representations significantly enhanced the performance in automated question answering by reading paragraphs. However, identifying the detailed knowledge trained in the MNLMs is difficult owing to numerous and intermingled parameters. This paper provides empirical but insightful analyses on the pretrained MNLMs with respect to common sense knowledge. First, we propose a test that measures what types of common sense knowledge do pretrained MNLMs understand. From the test, we observed that MNLMs partially understand various types of common sense knowledge but do not accurately understand the semantic meaning of relations. In addition, based on the difficulty of the question-answering task problems, we observed that pretrained MLM-based models are still vulnerable to problems that require common sense knowledge. We also experimentally demonstrated that we can elevate existing MNLM-based models by combining knowledge from an external common sense repository.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computation & Language

๐ŸŒ… ๐ŸŒ… Old Age

Attention Is All You Need

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, ... (+6 more)

cs.CL ๐Ÿ› NeurIPS ๐Ÿ“š 166.0K cites 9 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted