Reconfiguring k-path vertex covers

November 08, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Workshop on Algorithms and Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Duc A. Hoang, Akira Suzuki, Tsuyoshi Yagita arXiv ID 1911.03026 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DM Citations 4 Venue Workshop on Algorithms and Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A vertex subset $I$ of a graph $G$ is called a $k$-path vertex cover if every path on $k$ vertices in $G$ contains at least one vertex from $I$. The \textsc{$k$-Path Vertex Cover Reconfiguration ($k$-PVCR)} problem asks if one can transform one $k$-path vertex cover into another via a sequence of $k$-path vertex covers where each intermediate member is obtained from its predecessor by applying a given reconfiguration rule exactly once. We investigate the computational complexity of \textsc{$k$-PVCR} from the viewpoint of graph classes under the well-known reconfiguration rules: $\mathsf{TS}$, $\mathsf{TJ}$, and $\mathsf{TAR}$. The problem for $k=2$, known as the \textsc{Vertex Cover Reconfiguration (VCR)} problem, has been well-studied in the literature. We show that certain known hardness results for \textsc{VCR} on different graph classes including planar graphs, bounded bandwidth graphs, chordal graphs, and bipartite graphs, can be extended for \textsc{$k$-PVCR}. In particular, we prove a complexity dichotomy for \textsc{$k$-PVCR} on general graphs: on those whose maximum degree is $3$ (and even planar), the problem is $\mathtt{PSPACE}$-complete, while on those whose maximum degree is $2$ (i.e., paths and cycles), the problem can be solved in polynomial time. Additionally, we also design polynomial-time algorithms for \textsc{$k$-PVCR} on trees under each of $\mathsf{TJ}$ and $\mathsf{TAR}$. Moreover, on paths, cycles, and trees, we describe how one can construct a reconfiguration sequence between two given $k$-path vertex covers in a yes-instance. In particular, on paths, our constructed reconfiguration sequence is shortest.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted