Beyond Similarity: Relation Embedding with Dual Attentions for Item-based Recommendation

November 11, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Liang Zhang, Guannan Liu, Junjie Wu arXiv ID 1911.04099 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given the effectiveness and ease of use, Item-based Collaborative Filtering (ICF) methods have been broadly used in industry in recent years. The key of ICF lies in the similarity measurement between items, which however is a coarse-grained numerical value that can hardly capture users' fine-grained preferences toward different latent aspects of items from a representation learning perspective. In this paper, we propose a model called REDA (latent Relation Embedding with Dual Attentions) to address this challenge. REDA is essentially a deep learning based recommendation method that employs an item relation embedding scheme through a neural network structure for inter-item relations representation. A relational user embedding is then proposed by aggregating the relation embeddings between all purchased items of a user, which not only better characterizes user preferences but also alleviates the data sparsity problem. Moreover, to capture valid meta-knowledge that reflects users' desired latent aspects and meanwhile suppress their explosive growth towards overfitting, we further propose a dual attentions mechanism, including a memory attention and a weight attention. A relation-wise optimization method is finally developed for model inference by constructing a personalized ranking loss for item relations. Extensive experiments are implemented on real-world datasets and the proposed model is shown to greatly outperform state-of-the-art methods, especially when the data is sparse.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted