Frequent Elements with Witnesses in Data Streams

November 20, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christian Konrad arXiv ID 1911.08832 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Detecting frequent elements is among the oldest and most-studied problems in the area of data streams. Given a stream of $m$ data items in $\{1, 2, \dots, n\}$, the objective is to output items that appear at least $d$ times, for some threshold parameter $d$, and provably optimal algorithms are known today. However, in many applications, knowing only the frequent elements themselves is not enough: For example, an Internet router may not only need to know the most frequent destination IP addresses of forwarded packages, but also the timestamps of when these packages appeared or any other meta-data that "arrived" with the packages, e.g., their source IP addresses. In this paper, we introduce the witness version of the frequent elements problem: Given a desired approximation guarantee $Ξ±\ge 1$ and a desired frequency $d \le Ξ”$, where $Ξ”$ is the frequency of the most frequent item, the objective is to report an item together with at least $d / Ξ±$ timestamps of when the item appeared in the stream (or any other meta-data that arrived with the items). We give provably optimal algorithms for both the insertion-only and insertion-deletion stream settings: In insertion-only streams, we show that space $\tilde{O}(n + d \cdot n^{\frac{1}Ξ±})$ is necessary and sufficient for every integral $1 \le Ξ±\le \log n$. In insertion-deletion streams, we show that space $\tilde{O}(\frac{n \cdot d}{Ξ±^2})$ is necessary and sufficient, for every $Ξ±\le \sqrt{n}$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted