Stable Visual Summaries for Trajectory Collections

December 02, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jules Wulms, Juri BuchmΓΌller, Wouter Meulemans, Kevin Verbeek, Bettina Speckmann arXiv ID 1912.00719 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 9 Venue IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The availability of devices that track moving objects has led to an explosive growth in trajectory data. When exploring the resulting large trajectory collections, visual summaries are a useful tool to identify time intervals of interest. A typical approach is to represent the spatial positions of the tracked objects at each time step via a one-dimensional ordering; visualizations of such orderings can then be placed in temporal order along a time line. There are two main criteria to assess the quality of the resulting visual summary: spatial quality -- how well does the ordering capture the structure of the data at each time step, and stability -- how coherent are the orderings over consecutive time steps or temporal ranges? In this paper we introduce a new Stable Principal Component (SPC) method to compute such orderings, which is explicitly parameterized for stability, allowing a trade-off between the spatial quality and stability. We conduct extensive computational experiments that quantitatively compare the orderings produced by ours and other stable dimensionality-reduction methods to various state-of-the-art approaches using a set of well-established quality metrics that capture spatial quality and stability. We conclude that stable dimensionality reduction outperforms existing methods on stability, without sacrificing spatial quality or efficiency; in particular, our new SPC method does so at a fraction of the computational costs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted