In Defense of the Triplet Loss Again: Learning Robust Person Re-Identification with Fast Approximated Triplet Loss and Label Distillation

December 17, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ye Yuan, Wuyang Chen, Yang Yang, Zhangyang Wang arXiv ID 1912.07863 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 99 Venue 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The comparative losses (typically, triplet loss) are appealing choices for learning person re-identification (ReID) features. However, the triplet loss is computationally much more expensive than the (practically more popular) classification loss, limiting their wider usage in massive datasets. Moreover, the abundance of label noise and outliers in ReID datasets may also put the margin-based loss in jeopardy. This work addresses the above two shortcomings of triplet loss, extending its effectiveness to large-scale ReID datasets with potentially noisy labels. We propose a fast-approximated triplet (FAT) loss, which provably converts the point-wise triplet loss into its upper bound form, consisting of a point-to-set loss term plus cluster compactness regularization. It preserves the effectiveness of triplet loss, while leading to linear complexity to the training set size. A label distillation strategy is further designed to learn refined soft-labels in place of the potentially noisy labels, from only an identified subset of confident examples, through teacher-student networks. We conduct extensive experiments on three most popular ReID benchmarks (Market-1501, DukeMTMC-reID, and MSMT17), and demonstrate that FAT loss with distilled labels lead to ReID features with remarkable accuracy, efficiency, robustness, and direct transferability to unseen datasets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Fast R-CNN

Ross Girshick

cs.CV πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 27.7K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted