High-parallelism Inception-like Spiking Neural Networks for Unsupervised Feature Learning
December 02, 2019 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Neurocomputing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mingyuan Meng, Xingyu Yang, Lei Bi, Jinman Kim, Shanlin Xiao, Zhiyi Yu
arXiv ID
2001.01680
Category
cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary
Cross-listed
cs.LG,
q-bio.NC,
stat.ML
Citations
20
Venue
Neurocomputing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are brain-inspired, event-driven machine learning algorithms that have been widely recognized in producing ultra-high-energy-efficient hardware. Among existing SNNs, unsupervised SNNs based on synaptic plasticity, especially Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP), are considered to have great potential in imitating the learning process of the biological brain. Nevertheless, the existing STDP-based SNNs have limitations in constrained learning capability and/or slow learning speed. Most STDP-based SNNs adopted a slow-learning Fully-Connected (FC) architecture and used a sub-optimal vote-based scheme for spike decoding. In this paper, we overcome these limitations with: 1) a design of high-parallelism network architecture, inspired by the Inception module in Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs); 2) use of a Vote-for-All (VFA) decoding layer as a replacement to the standard vote-based spike decoding scheme, to reduce the information loss in spike decoding and, 3) a proposed adaptive repolarization (resetting) mechanism that accelerates SNNs' learning by enhancing spiking activities. Our experimental results on two established benchmark datasets (MNIST/EMNIST) show that our network architecture resulted in superior performance compared to the widely used FC architecture and a more advanced Locally-Connected (LC) architecture, and that our SNN achieved competitive results with state-of-the-art unsupervised SNNs (95.64%/80.11% accuracy on the MNIST/EMNISE dataset) while having superior learning efficiency and robustness against hardware damage. Our SNN achieved great classification accuracy with only hundreds of training iterations, and random destruction of large numbers of synapses or neurons only led to negligible performance degradation.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Neural & Evolutionary
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesis
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learning
๐
๐
Old Age
Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted