Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting

January 13, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Johannes K. Fichte, Markus Hecher, Patrick Thier, Stefan Woltran arXiv ID 2001.04191 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.DS, math.LO Citations 26 Venue International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Bounded treewidth is one of the most cited combinatorial invariants, which was applied in the literature for solving several counting problems efficiently. A canonical counting problem is #SAT, which asks to count the satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula. Recent work shows that benchmarking instances for #SAT often have reasonably small treewidth. This paper deals with counting problems for instances of small treewidth. We introduce a general framework to solve counting questions based on state-of-the-art database management systems (DBMS). Our framework takes explicitly advantage of small treewidth by solving instances using dynamic programming (DP) on tree decompositions (TD). Therefore, we implement the concept of DP into a DBMS (PostgreSQL), since DP algorithms are already often given in terms of table manipulations in theory. This allows for elegant specifications of DP algorithms and the use of SQL to manipulate records and tables, which gives us a natural approach to bring DP algorithms into practice. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first approach to employ a DBMS for algorithms on TDs. A key advantage of our approach is that DBMS naturally allow to deal with huge tables with a limited amount of main memory (RAM), parallelization, as well as suspending computation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted