A Note on Distance-Preserving Graph Sparsification

January 21, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Information Processing Letters

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Greg Bodwin arXiv ID 2001.07741 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.CO Citations 7 Venue Information Processing Letters Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider problems of the following type: given a graph $G$, how many edges are needed in the worst case for a sparse subgraph $H$ that approximately preserves distances between a given set of node pairs $P$? Examples include pairwise spanners, distance preservers, reachability preservers, etc. There has been a trend in the area of simple constructions based on the hitting set technique, followed by somewhat more complicated constructions that improve over the bounds obtained from hitting sets by roughly a $\log$ factor. In this note, we point out that the simpler constructions based on hitting sets don't actually need an extra $\log$ factor in the first place. This simplifies and unifies a few proofs in the area, and it improves the size of the $+4$ pairwise spanner from $\widetilde{O}(np^{2/7})$ [Kavitha Th. Comp. Sys. '17] to $O(np^{2/7})$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted