๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Axiomatizing Maximal Progress and Discrete Time
January 22, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ Log. Methods Comput. Sci.
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mario Bravetti
arXiv ID
2001.08040
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.PL
Citations
3
Venue
Log. Methods Comput. Sci.
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Milner's complete proof system for observational congruence is crucially based on the possibility to equate $ฯ$ divergent expressions to non-divergent ones by means of the axiom $recX. (ฯ.X + E) = recX. ฯ. E$. In the presence of a notion of priority, where, e.g., actions of type $ฮด$ have a lower priority than silent $ฯ$ actions, this axiom is no longer sound. Such a form of priority is, however, common in timed process algebra, where, due to the interpretation of $ฮด$ as a time delay, it naturally arises from the maximal progress assumption. We here present our solution, based on introducing an auxiliary operator $pri(E)$ defining a "priority scope", to the long time open problem of axiomatizing priority using standard observational congruence: we provide a complete axiomatization for a basic process algebra with priority and (unguarded) recursion. We also show that, when the setting is extended by considering static operators of a discrete time calculus, an axiomatization that is complete over (a characterization of) finite-state terms can be developed by re-using techniques devised in the context of a cooperation with Prof. Jos Baeten.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal