The Impact of Content Commenting on User Continuance in Online Q&A Communities: An Affordance Perspective
January 24, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Langtao Chen
arXiv ID
2001.08927
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
cs.SI
Citations
3
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities provide convenient and innovative ways for participants to share information and collaboratively solve problems with others. A growing challenge for those Q&A communities is to encourage and maintain ongoing user participation. From the perspective of motivational affordances, this study proposes a research framework to explain the effect of content commenting on user continuance behavior in online Q&A communities. The moderating role of participant's tenure in the relationship between content commenting and user continuance is also explored. Using a longitudinal panel dataset collected from a large online Q&A community, this research empirically tests the effect of content commenting on continued user participation in the Q&A community. The results show that both comment receipt and comment provisioning are important motivating factors for user continuance in the community. Specifically, received comments on questions submitted by a participant have a positive effect on the participant's continuance of posting questions, while answer comments both received and posted by a participant have positive impact on user continuance of posting answers in the community. In addition, tenure in the community is indeed found to have a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between content commenting and user continuance. This research not only offers a more nuanced theoretical understanding of how content commenting affects continued user involvement and how participants' tenure in the community moderates the impact of content commenting, but also provides implications for improving user continuance in online Q&A communities.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted