Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Measuring Influence of AI 'Assessments' on Moral Decision-Making

January 13, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Lok Chan, Kenzie Doyle, Duncan McElfresh, Vincent Conitzer, John P. Dickerson, Jana Schaich Borg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong arXiv ID 2001.09766 Category cs.CY: Computers & Society Cross-listed cs.HC Citations 10 Venue AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Given AI's growing role in modeling and improving decision-making, how and when to present users with feedback is an urgent topic to address. We empirically examined the effect of feedback from false AI on moral decision-making about donor kidney allocation. We found some evidence that judgments about whether a patient should receive a kidney can be influenced by feedback about participants' own decision-making perceived to be given by AI, even if the feedback is entirely random. We also discovered different effects between assessments presented as being from human experts and assessments presented as being from AI.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computers & Society

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, ... (+2 more)

cs.CY πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 1.5K cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted