Advaita: Bug Duplicity Detection System

January 24, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Amit Kumar, Manohar Madanu, Hari Prakash, Lalitha Jonnavithula, Srinivasa Rao Aravilli arXiv ID 2001.10376 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Bugs are prevalent in software development. To improve software quality, bugs are filed using a bug tracking system. Properties of a reported bug would consist of a headline, description, project, product, component that is affected by the bug and the severity of the bug. Duplicate bugs rate (% of duplicate bugs) are in the range from single digit (1 to 9%) to double digits (40%) based on the product maturity , size of the code and number of engineers working on the project. Duplicate bugs range are between 9% to 39% in some of the open source projects like Eclipse, Firefox etc. Detection of duplicity deals with identifying whether any two bugs convey the same meaning. This detection of duplicates helps in de-duplication. Detecting duplicate bugs help reduce triaging efforts and saves time for developers in fixing the issues. Traditional natural language processing techniques are less accurate in identifying similarity between sentences. Using the bug data present in a bug tracking system, various approaches were explored including several machine learning algorithms, to obtain a viable approach that can identify duplicate bugs, given a pair of sentences(i.e. the respective bug descriptions). This approach considers multiple sets of features viz. basic text statistical features, semantic features and contextual features. These features are extracted from the headline, description and component and are subsequently used to train a classification algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted