On $ฮ”$-Modular Integer Linear Problems In The Canonical Form And Equivalent Problems

February 03, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Journal of Global Optimization

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors D. V. Gribanov, I. A. Shumilov, D. S. Malyshev, P. M. Pardalos arXiv ID 2002.01307 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 20 Venue Journal of Global Optimization Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Many papers in the field of integer linear programming (ILP, for short) are devoted to problems of the type $\max\{c^\top x \colon A x = b,\, x \in \mathbb{Z}^n_{\geq 0}\}$, where all the entries of $A,b,c$ are integer, parameterized by the number of rows of $A$ and $\|A\|_{\max}$. This class of problems is known under the name of ILP problems in the standard form, adding the word "bounded" if $x \leq u$, for some integer vector $u$. Recently, many new sparsity, proximity, and complexity results were obtained for bounded and unbounded ILP problems in the standard form. In this paper, we consider ILP problems in the canonical form $$\max\{c^\top x \colon b_l \leq A x \leq b_r,\, x \in \mathbb{Z}^n\},$$ where $b_l$ and $b_r$ are integer vectors. We assume that the integer matrix $A$ has the rank $n$, $(n + m)$ rows, $n$ columns, and parameterize the problem by $m$ and $ฮ”(A)$, where $ฮ”(A)$ is the maximum of $n \times n$ sub-determinants of $A$, taken in the absolute value. We show that any ILP problem in the standard form can be polynomially reduced to some ILP problem in the canonical form, preserving $m$ and $ฮ”(A)$, but the reverse reduction is not always possible. More precisely, we define the class of generalized ILP problems in the standard form, which includes an additional group constraint, and prove the equivalence to ILP problems in the canonical form. We generalize known sparsity, proximity, and complexity bounds for ILP problems in the canonical form. Additionally, sometimes, we strengthen previously known results for ILP problems in the canonical form, and, sometimes, we give shorter proofs. Finally, we consider the special cases of $m \in \{0,1\}$. By this way, we give specialised sparsity, proximity, and complexity bounds for the problems on simplices, Knapsack problems and Subset-Sum problems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity