How do Quantifiers Affect the Quality of Requirements?

February 07, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Katharina Winter, Henning Femmer, Andreas Vogelsang arXiv ID 2002.02672 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 6 Venue Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Context: Requirements quality can have a substantial impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of using requirements artifacts in a development process. Quantifiers such as "at least", "all", or "exactly" are common language constructs used to express requirements. Quantifiers can be formulated by affirmative phrases ("At least") or negative phrases ("Not less than"). Problem: It is long assumed that negation in quantification negatively affects the readability of requirements, however, empirical research on these topics remains sparse. Principal Idea: In a web-based experiment with 51 participants, we compare the impact of negations and quantifiers on readability in terms of reading effort, reading error rate and perceived reading difficulty of requirements. Results: For 5 out of 9 quantifiers, our participants performed better on the affirmative phrase compared to the negative phrase. Only for one quantifier, the negative phrase was more effective. Contribution: This research focuses on creating an empirical understanding of the effect of language in Requirements Engineering. It furthermore provides concrete advice on how to phrase requirements.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted