Different Types of Voice User Interface Failures May Cause Different Degrees of Frustration

February 10, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shiyoh Goetsu, Tetsuya Sakai arXiv ID 2002.03582 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 4 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We report on an investigation into how different types of failures in a voice user interface (VUI) affects user frustration. To this end, we conducted a pilot user study ($n=10$) and a main user study ($n=30$), both with a simple voice-operated calendar application that we built using the Alexa Skills Kit. In our pilot study, we identified three major failure types as perceived by the users, namely, Reason Unknown, Speech Misrecognition, and Utterance Pattern Match Failure, along with more fine-grained failure types from the developer's viewpoint such as Intent Pattern Match Failure and Intent Misclassification. Then, in our main study, we set up three user tasks that were designed to each induce a specific failure type, and collected user frustration ratings for each task. Our main findings are: (a)Users may be relatively tolerant to user-perceived Speech Misrecognition, and not so to user-perceived Reason Unknown and Utterance Mattern Match Failures; (b)Regarding the relationship between developer-perceived and user-perceived failure types, 68.8\% of developer-perceived Intent Misclassification instances caused user-perceived Reason Unkown failures. From (a) and (b), a practical design implication would be to try to prevent Intent Misclassification from happening by carefully crafting the utterance patterns for each intent.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted