Efficient ECM factorization in parallel with the Lyness map

February 05, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Andrew N. W. Hone arXiv ID 2002.03811 Category math.NT Cross-listed cs.CR, nlin.SI Citations 3 Venue IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The Lyness map is a birational map in the plane which provides one of the simplest discrete analogues of a Hamiltonian system with one degree of freedom, having a conserved quantity and an invariant symplectic form. As an example of a symmetric Quispel-Roberts-Thompson (QRT) map, each generic orbit of the Lyness map lies on a curve of genus one, and corresponds to a sequence of points on an elliptic curve which is one of the fibres in a pencil of biquadratic curves in the plane. Here we present a version of the elliptic curve method (ECM) for integer factorization, which is based on iteration of the Lyness map with a particular choice of initial data. More precisely, we give an algorithm for scalar multiplication of a point on an elliptic curve, which is represented by one of the curves in the Lyness pencil. In order to avoid field inversion, and require only field multiplication (${\bf M}$), squaring (${\bf S}$) and addition, projective coordinates in $\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}^1$ are used. Neglecting multiplication by curve constants (assumed small), each addition of the chosen point uses $2{\bf M}$, while each doubling step requires $15{\bf M}$. We further show that the doubling step can be implemented efficiently in parallel with four processors, dropping the effective cost to $4{\bf M}$. Our scalar multiplication algorithm should require, on average, roughly twice as many multiplications per bit as the fastest state of the art methods using twisted Edwards curves with small constants, but it can be applied to any elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$, whereas twisted Edwards curves (equivalent to Montgomery curves) correspond to only a subset of all elliptic curves. Hence, if implemented in parallel, our method may have potential advantages for integer factorization or elliptic curve cryptography.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” math.NT

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted