Simplex based Steiner tree instances yield large integrality gaps for the bidirected cut relaxation
February 18, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Robert Vicari
arXiv ID
2002.07912
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DM,
math.CO
Citations
3
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
The bidirected cut relaxation is the characteristic representative of the bidirected relaxations ($\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$) which are a well-known class of equivalent LP-relaxations for the NP-hard Steiner Tree Problem in Graphs (STP). Although no general approximation algorithm based on $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ with an approximation ratio better than $2$ for STP is known, it is mostly preferred in integer programming as an implementation of STP, since there exists a formulation of compact size, which turns out to be very effective in practice. It is known that the integrality gap of $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ is at most $2$, and a long standing open question is whether the integrality gap is less than $2$ or not. The best lower bound so far is $\frac{36}{31} \approx 1.161$ proven by Byrka et al. [BGRS13]. Based on the work of Chakrabarty et al. [CDV11] about embedding STP instances into simplices by considering appropriate dual formulations, we improve on this result by constructing a new class of instances and showing that their integrality gaps tend at least to $\frac{6}{5} = 1.2$. More precisely, we consider the class of equivalent LP-relaxations $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$, that can be obtained by strengthening $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ by already known straightforward Steiner vertex degree constraints, and show that the worst case ratio regarding the optimum value between $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ and $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$ is at least $\frac{6}{5}$. Since $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}^{+}$ is a lower bound for the hypergraphic relaxations ($\mathrm{\mathcal{HYP}}$), another well-known class of equivalent LP-relaxations on which the current best $(\ln(4) + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for STP by Byrka et al. [BGRS13] is based, this worst case ratio also holds for $\mathrm{\mathcal{BCR}}$ and $\mathrm{\mathcal{HYP}}$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted