Geometry-aware Compensation Scheme for Morphing Drones

March 09, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Amedeo Fabris, Kevin Kleber, Davide Falanga, Davide Scaramuzza arXiv ID 2003.03929 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 20 Venue IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Morphing multirotors, such as the Foldable Drone , can increase the versatility of drones employing in-flight-adaptive-morphology. To further increase precision in their tasks, recent works have investigated stable flight in asymmetric morphologies mainly leveraging the low-level controller. However, the aerodynamic effects embedded in multirotors are only analyzed in fixed shape aerial vehicles and are completely ignored in morphing drones. In this paper, we investigate the effects of the partial overlap between the propellers and the main body of a morphing quadrotor. We perform experiments to characterize such effects and design a morphology-aware control scheme to account for them. To guarantee the right trade-off between efficiency and compactness of the vehicle, we propose a simple geometry-aware compensation scheme based on the results of these experiments. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by deploying the compensation scheme on the Foldable Drone, a quadrotor that can fold its arms around the main body. The same set of experiments are performed and compared against one another by activating and deactivating the compensation scheme offline or during the flight. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work counteracting the aerodynamic effects of a morphing quadrotor during flight and showing the effects of partial overlap between a propeller and the central body of the drone.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted