Notes on Equitable Partitions into Matching Forests in Mixed Graphs and into $b$-branchings in Digraphs

March 24, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Kenjiro Takazawa arXiv ID 2003.10774 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 0 Venue Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
An equitable partition into branchings in a digraph is a partition of the arc set into branchings such that the sizes of any two branchings differ at most by one. For a digraph whose arc set can be partitioned into $k$ branchings, there always exists an equitable partition into $k$ branchings. In this paper, we present two extensions of equitable partitions into branchings in digraphs: those into matching forests in mixed graphs; and into $b$-branchings in digraphs. For matching forests, Kirรกly and Yokoi (2022) considered a tricriteria equitability based on the sizes of the matching forest, and the matching and branching therein. In contrast to this, we introduce a single-criterion equitability based on the number of covered vertices, which is plausible in the light of the delta-matroid structure of matching forests. While the existence of this equitable partition can be derived from a lemma in Kirรกly and Yokoi, we present its direct and simpler proof. For $b$-branchings, we define an equitability notion based on the size of the $b$-branching and the indegrees of all vertices, and prove that an equitable partition always exists. We then derive the integer decomposition property of the associated polytopes.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Combinatorics

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 94 cites 10 years ago