Impact of Tactile and Visual Feedback on Breathing Rhythm and User Experience in VR Exergaming

April 03, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Robert Greinacher, Tanja Kojić, Luis Meier, Rudresha Gulaganjihalli Parameshappa, Sebastian Mâller, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons arXiv ID 2004.01555 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.MM Citations 12 Venue International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Combining interconnected wearables provides fascinating opportunities like augmenting exergaming with virtual coaches, feedback on the execution of sports activities, or how to improve on them. Breathing rhythm is a particularly interesting physiological dimension since it is easy and unobtrusive to measure and gained data provide valuable insights regarding the correct execution of movements, especially when analyzed together with additional movement data in real-time. In this work, we focus on indoor rowing since it is a popular sport that's often done alone without extensive instructions. We compare a visual breathing indication with haptic guidance in order for athletes to maintain a correct, efficient, and healthy breathing-movement-synchronicity (BMS) while working out. Also, user experience and acceptance of the different modalities were measured. The results show a positive and statistically significant impact of purely verbal instructions and purely tactile feedback on BMS and no significant impact of visual feedback. Interestingly, the subjective ratings indicate a strong preference for the visual modality and even an aversion for the haptic feedback, although objectively the performance benefited most from using the latter.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted