Probabilistic modelling of gait for robust passive monitoring in daily life
April 07, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yordan P. Raykov, Luc J. W. Evers, Reham Badawy, Bastiaan Bloem, Tom M. Heskes, Marjan Meinders, Kasper Claes, Max A. Little
arXiv ID
2004.03047
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
eess.SP
Citations
18
Venue
IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Passive monitoring in daily life may provide invaluable insights about a person's health throughout the day. Wearable sensor devices are likely to play a key role in enabling such monitoring in a non-obtrusive fashion. However, sensor data collected in daily life reflects multiple health and behavior related factors together. This creates the need for structured principled analysis to produce reliable and interpretable predictions that can be used to support clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this work we develop a principled modelling approach for free-living gait (walking) analysis. Gait is a promising target for non-obtrusive monitoring because it is common and indicative of various movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), yet its analysis has largely been limited to experimentally controlled lab settings. To locate and characterize stationary gait segments in free living using accelerometers, we present an unsupervised statistical framework designed to segment signals into differing gait and non-gait patterns. Our flexible probabilistic framework combines empirical assumptions about gait into a principled graphical model with all of its merits. We demonstrate the approach on a new video-referenced dataset including unscripted daily living activities of 25 PD patients and 25 controls, in and around their own houses. We evaluate our ability to detect gait and predict medication induced fluctuations in PD patients based on modelled gait. Our evaluation includes a comparison between sensors attached at multiple body locations including wrist, ankle, trouser pocket and lower back.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted