First Stretch then Shrink and Bulk: A Two Phase Approach for Enumeration of Maximal $(Ξ”, Ξ³)$\mbox{-}Cliques of a Temporal Network

April 09, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Suman Banerjee, Bithika Pal arXiv ID 2004.05935 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DB, cs.MA Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
A \emph{Temporal Network} (also known as \emph{Link Stream} or \emph{Time-Varying Graph}) is often used to model a time-varying relationship among a group of agents. It is typically represented as a collection of triplets of the form $(u,v,t)$ that denotes the interaction between the agents $u$ and $v$ at time $t$. For analyzing the contact patterns of the agents forming a temporal network, recently the notion of classical \textit{clique} of a \textit{static graph} has been generalized as \textit{$Ξ”$\mbox{-}Clique} of a Temporal Network. In the same direction, one of our previous studies introduces the notion of \textit{$(Ξ”, Ξ³)$\mbox{-}Clique}, which is basically a \textit{vertex set}, \textit{time interval} pair, in which every pair of the clique vertices are linked at least $Ξ³$ times in every $Ξ”$ duration of the time interval. In this paper, we propose a different methodology for enumerating all the maximal $(Ξ”, Ξ³)$\mbox{-}Cliques of a given temporal network. The proposed methodology is broadly divided into two phases. In the first phase, each temporal link is processed for constructing $(Ξ”, Ξ³)$\mbox{-}Clique(s) with maximum duration. In the second phase, these initial cliques are expanded by vertex addition to form the maximal cliques. From the experimentation carried out on $5$ real\mbox{-}world temporal network datasets, we observe that the proposed methodology enumerates all the maximal $(Ξ”,Ξ³)$\mbox{-}Cliques efficiently, particularly when the dataset is sparse. As a special case ($Ξ³=1$), the proposed methodology is also able to enumerate $(Ξ”,1) \equiv Ξ”$\mbox{-}cliques with much less time compared to the existing methods.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted