Exact and Approximate Algorithms for Computing a Second Hamiltonian Cycle

April 13, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Argyrios Deligkas, George B. Mertzios, Paul G. Spirakis, Viktor Zamaraev arXiv ID 2004.06036 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 3 Venue International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we consider the following total functional problem: Given a cubic Hamiltonian graph $G$ and a Hamiltonian cycle $C_0$ of $G$, how can we compute a second Hamiltonian cycle $C_1 \neq C_0$ of $G$? Cedric Smith proved in 1946, using a non-constructive parity argument, that such a second Hamiltonian cycle always exists. Our main result is an algorithm which computes the second Hamiltonian cycle in time $O(n \cdot 2^{(0.3-\varepsilon)n})$ time, for some positive constant $\varepsilon>0$, and in polynomial space, thus improving the state of the art running time for solving this problem. Our algorithm is based on a fundamental structural property of Thomason's lollipop algorithm, which we prove here for the first time. In the direction of approximating the length of a second cycle in a Hamiltonian graph $G$ with a given Hamiltonian cycle $C_0$ (where we may not have guarantees on the existence of a second Hamiltonian cycle), we provide a linear-time algorithm computing a second cycle with length at least $n - 4Ξ±(\sqrt{n}+2Ξ±)+8$, where $Ξ±= \frac{Ξ”-2}{Ξ΄-2}$ and $Ξ΄,Ξ”$ are the minimum and the maximum degree of the graph, respectively. This approximation result also improves the state of the art.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted