A Rigorous Runtime Analysis of the $(1 + (λ, λ))$ GA on Jump Functions

April 14, 2020 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Algorithmica

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Denis Antipov, Benjamin Doerr, Vitalii Karavaev arXiv ID 2004.06702 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 16 Venue Algorithmica Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The $(1 + (λ,λ))$ genetic algorithm is a younger evolutionary algorithm trying to profit also from inferior solutions. Rigorous runtime analyses on unimodal fitness functions showed that it can indeed be faster than classical evolutionary algorithms, though on these simple problems the gains were only moderate. In this work, we conduct the first runtime analysis of this algorithm on a multimodal problem class, the jump functions benchmark. We show that with the right parameters, the \ollga optimizes any jump function with jump size $2 \le k \le n/4$ in expected time $O(n^{(k+1)/2} e^{O(k)} k^{-k/2})$, which significantly and already for constant~$k$ outperforms standard mutation-based algorithms with their $Θ(n^k)$ runtime and standard crossover-based algorithms with their $\tilde{O}(n^{k-1})$ runtime guarantee. For the isolated problem of leaving the local optimum of jump functions, we determine provably optimal parameters that lead to a runtime of $(n/k)^{k/2} e^{Θ(k)}$. This suggests some general advice on how to set the parameters of the \ollga, which might ease the further use of this algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Neural & Evolutionary

🔮 🔮 The Ethereal

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE 🏛 IEEE TNNLS 📚 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted