An Extension of PlΓΌcker Relations with Applications to Subdeterminant Maximization

April 26, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nima Anari, Thuy-Duong Vuong arXiv ID 2004.13018 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM Citations 4 Venue International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a matrix $A$ and $k\geq 0$, we study the problem of finding the $k\times k$ submatrix of $A$ with the maximum determinant in absolute value. This problem is motivated by the question of computing the determinant-based lower bound of [LSV86] on hereditary discrepancy, which was later shown to be an approximate upper bound as well [Mat13]. The special case where $k$ coincides with one of the dimensions of $A$ has been extensively studied. [Nik15] gave a $2^{O(k)}$-approximation algorithm for this special case, matching known lower bounds; he also raised as an open problem the question of designing approximation algorithms for the general case. We make progress towards answering this question by giving the first efficient approximation algorithm for general $k\times k$ subdeterminant maximization with an approximation ratio that depends only on $k$. Our algorithm finds a $k^{O(k)}$-approximate solution by performing a simple local search. Our main technical contribution, enabling the analysis of the approximation ratio, is an extension of PlΓΌcker relations for the Grassmannian, which may be of independent interest; PlΓΌcker relations are quadratic polynomial equations involving the set of $k\times k$ subdeterminants of a $k\times n$ matrix. We find an extension of these relations to $k\times k$ subdeterminants of general $m\times n$ matrices.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted