How good is good enough for COVID19 apps? The influence of benefits, accuracy, and privacy on willingness to adopt

May 09, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gabriel Kaptchuk, Daniel G. Goldstein, Eszter Hargittai, Jake Hofman, Elissa M. Redmiles arXiv ID 2005.04343 Category cs.CY: Computers & Society Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.HC, cs.LG Citations 88 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
A growing number of contact tracing apps are being developed to complement manual contact tracing. A key question is whether users will be willing to adopt these contact tracing apps. In this work, we survey over 4,500 Americans to evaluate (1) the effect of both accuracy and privacy concerns on reported willingness to install COVID19 contact tracing apps and (2) how different groups of users weight accuracy vs. privacy. Drawing on our findings from these first two research questions, we (3) quantitatively model how the amount of public health benefit (reduction in infection rate), amount of individual benefit (true-positive detection of exposures to COVID), and degree of privacy risk in a hypothetical contact tracing app may influence American's willingness to install. Our work takes a descriptive ethics approach toward offering implications for the development of policy and app designs related to COVID19.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computers & Society

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, ... (+2 more)

cs.CY ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 1.5K cites 6 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted