On Efficient Connectivity-Preserving Transformations in a Grid

May 17, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Abdullah Almethen, Othon Michail, Igor Potapov arXiv ID 2005.08351 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CG, cs.RO Citations 5 Venue Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider a discrete system of $n$ devices lying on a 2-dimensional square grid and forming an initial connected shape $S_I$. Each device is equipped with a linear-strength mechanism which enables it to move a whole line of consecutive devices in a single time-step. We study the problem of transforming $S_I$ into a given connected target shape $S_F$ of the same number of devices, via a finite sequence of \emph{line moves}. Our focus is on designing \emph{centralised} transformations aiming at \emph{minimising the total number of moves} subject to the constraint of \emph{preserving connectivity} of the shape throughout the course of the transformation. We first give very fast connectivity-preserving transformations for the case in which the \emph{associated graphs} of $ S_I $ and $ S_F $ are isomorphic to a Hamiltonian line. In particular, our transformations make $ O(n \log n $) moves, which is asymptotically equal to the best known running time of connectivity-breaking transformations. Our most general result is then a connectivity-preserving \emph{universal transformation} that can transform any initial connected shape $ S_I $ into any target connected shape $ S_F $, through a sequence of $O(n\sqrt{n})$ moves. Finally, we establish $Ξ©(n \log n)$ lower bounds for two restricted sets of transformations. These are the first lower bounds for this model and are matching the best known $ O(n \log n) $ upper bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted