Arms Race in Adversarial Malware Detection: A Survey

May 24, 2020 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM Computing Surveys

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Arms Race in Adversarial Malware Detection: A Survey"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Deqiang Li, Qianmu Li, Yanfang Ye, Shouhuai Xu arXiv ID 2005.11671 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 56 Venue ACM Computing Surveys Last Checked 1 day ago
Abstract
Malicious software (malware) is a major cyber threat that has to be tackled with Machine Learning (ML) techniques because millions of new malware examples are injected into cyberspace on a daily basis. However, ML is vulnerable to attacks known as adversarial examples. In this paper, we survey and systematize the field of Adversarial Malware Detection (AMD) through the lens of a unified conceptual framework of assumptions, attacks, defenses, and security properties. This not only leads us to map attacks and defenses to partial order structures, but also allows us to clearly describe the attack-defense arms race in the AMD context. We draw a number of insights, including: knowing the defender's feature set is critical to the success of transfer attacks; the effectiveness of practical evasion attacks largely depends on the attacker's freedom in conducting manipulations in the problem space; knowing the attacker's manipulation set is critical to the defender's success; the effectiveness of adversarial training depends on the defender's capability in identifying the most powerful attack. We also discuss a number of future research directions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security