Equality of Learning Opportunity via Individual Fairness in Personalized Recommendations

June 07, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mirko Marras, Ludovico Boratto, Guilherme Ramos, Gianni Fenu arXiv ID 2006.04282 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 50 Venue International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Online educational platforms are playing a primary role in mediating the success of individuals' careers. Therefore, while building overlying content recommendation services, it becomes essential to guarantee that learners are provided with equal recommended learning opportunities, according to the platform values, context, and pedagogy. Though the importance of ensuring equality of learning opportunities has been well investigated in traditional institutions, how this equality can be operationalized in online learning ecosystems through recommender systems is still under-explored. In this paper, we formalize educational principles that model recommendations' learning properties, and a novel fairness metric that combines them in order to monitor the equality of recommended learning opportunities among learners. Then, we envision a scenario wherein an educational platform should be arranged in such a way that the generated recommendations meet each principle to a certain degree for all learners, constrained to their individual preferences. Under this view, we explore the learning opportunities provided by recommender systems in a large-scale course platform, uncovering systematic inequalities. To reduce this effect, we propose a novel post-processing approach that balances personalization and equality of recommended opportunities. Experiments show that our approach leads to higher equality, with a negligible loss in personalization. Our study moves a step forward in operationalizing the ethics of human learning in recommendations, a core unit of intelligent educational systems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted