Design and Development of an Automated Coimagination Support System

June 05, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors John Noel Victorino, Naoto Fukunaga, Tomohiro Shibata arXiv ID 2006.04864 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CY Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Coimagination method is a novel approach to support interactive communication for activating three (3) cognitive functions: episodic memory, division of attention, and planning. These cognitive functions are known to decline at an early stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In previous studies about the coimagination method, experimenters tested different settings in different care institutions. Out of these experiments, various measures were introduced, analyzed, and presented. However, ease of changing configuration based on participants, and a quick assessment of captured data remained challenging. Also, several observers and measurers are needed to conduct the coimagination method. In this paper, we propose the initial design and development of an automated coimagination support system that can handle such challenges. We aim to have an automated coimagination support system that can be used easily either by healthy participants or elderly participants via a natural voice interface. In this paper, our focus is to measure how well our proposed features work with elderly participants. Preliminary experiments were conducted with healthy participants, and notably, with actual elder participants. Healthy participants experienced longer speaking round and question-and-answer round than with elderly participants; while, the latter had preparation time before the speaking round. In these preliminary experiments, our initial system showed the capability to handle different configurations. Healthy participants have operated the system using voice, while elderly participants managed to use the system with minimal assistance.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted