Diversity Policy Gradient for Sample Efficient Quality-Diversity Optimization
June 15, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Thomas Pierrot, Valentin MacΓ©, FΓ©lix Chalumeau, Arthur Flajolet, Geoffrey Cideron, Karim Beguir, Antoine Cully, Olivier Sigaud, Nicolas Perrin-Gilbert
arXiv ID
2006.08505
Category
cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
74
Venue
Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
A fascinating aspect of nature lies in its ability to produce a large and diverse collection of organisms that are all high-performing in their niche. By contrast, most AI algorithms focus on finding a single efficient solution to a given problem. Aiming for diversity in addition to performance is a convenient way to deal with the exploration-exploitation trade-off that plays a central role in learning. It also allows for increased robustness when the returned collection contains several working solutions to the considered problem, making it well-suited for real applications such as robotics. Quality-Diversity (QD) methods are evolutionary algorithms designed for this purpose. This paper proposes a novel algorithm, QDPG, which combines the strength of Policy Gradient algorithms and Quality Diversity approaches to produce a collection of diverse and high-performing neural policies in continuous control environments. The main contribution of this work is the introduction of a Diversity Policy Gradient (DPG) that exploits information at the time-step level to drive policies towards more diversity in a sample-efficient manner. Specifically, QDPG selects neural controllers from a MAP-Elites grid and uses two gradient-based mutation operators to improve both quality and diversity. Our results demonstrate that QDPG is significantly more sample-efficient than its evolutionary competitors.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Artificial Intelligence
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Prediction
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted