APX-Hardness and Approximation for the k-Burning Number Problem

June 25, 2020 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Workshop on Algorithms and Computation

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Debajyoti Mondal, N. Parthiban, V. Kavitha, Indra Rajasingh arXiv ID 2006.14733 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 18 Venue Workshop on Algorithms and Computation Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Consider an information diffusion process on a graph $G$ that starts with $k>0$ burnt vertices, and at each subsequent step, burns the neighbors of the currently burnt vertices, as well as $k$ other unburnt vertices. The \emph{$k$-burning number} of $G$ is the minimum number of steps $b_k(G)$ such that all the vertices can be burned within $b_k(G)$ steps. Note that the last step may have smaller than $k$ unburnt vertices available, where all of them are burned. The $1$-burning number coincides with the well-known burning number problem, which was proposed to model the spread of social contagion. The generalization to $k$-burning number allows us to examine different worst-case contagion scenarios by varying the spread factor $k$. In this paper we prove that computing $k$-burning number is APX-hard, for any fixed constant $k$. We then give an $O((n+m)\log n)$-time 3-approximation algorithm for computing $k$-burning number, for any $k\ge 1$, where $n$ and $m$ are the number of vertices and edges, respectively. Finally, we show that even if the burning sources are given as an input, computing a burning sequence itself is an NP-hard problem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity