The Sci-hub Effect: Sci-hub downloads lead to more article citations

June 26, 2020 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors J. C. Correa, H. Laverde-Rojas, F. Marmolejo-Ramos, J. Tejada, ล . Bahnรญk arXiv ID 2006.14979 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.IR, stat.AP Citations 5 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Citations are often used as a metric of the impact of scientific publications. Here, we examine how the number of downloads from Sci-hub as well as various characteristics of publications and their authors predicts future citations. Using data from 12 leading journals in economics, consumer research, neuroscience, and multidisciplinary research, we found that articles downloaded from Sci-hub were cited 1.72 times more than papers not downloaded from Sci-hub and that the number of downloads from Sci-hub was a robust predictor of future citations. Among other characteristics of publications, the number of figures in a manuscript consistently predicts its future citations. The results suggest that limited access to publications may limit some scientific research from achieving its full impact.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted